{"id":"W1967281592","doi":"10.1007/s11409-010-9066-0","title":"Consistent results with the consistency hypothesis? The effects of epistemic beliefs on metacognitive processing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metacognition and Learning","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Context (archaeology); Think aloud protocol; Recall; Metaphor; Empirical research; Protocol analysis; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000698627,0.000164415,0.0002211203,0.00005764185,0.0005439783,0.00003888806,0.0001096973,0.00006121171,0.00009201631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005922111,0.0000806739,0.00006709697,0.0001648273,0.0005404531,0.00006001214,0.00002089297,0.0003740771,0.00003300458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009349081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004138706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001439846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983442,0.0007554256,0.0002582905,0.0002700112,0.0001702851,0.0002017399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968815,0.002417191,0.000328918,0.0001557271,0.000178581,0.00003805105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008248813,0.002437833,0.01200987,0.001772516,0.004884499,0.0002278137,0.3534098,0.00005656144,0.004570013,0.1375252,0.003461477,0.4713956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003578049,0.003304806,0.8098853,0.0009882193,0.001354804,0.0002704624,0.166719,0.00002201884,0.003573443,0.005573321,0.004124949,0.0006056661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8331698,0.002882536,0.0001106764,0.002678713,0.0001873072,0.0005161816,0.000007098954,0.00005732794,0.1603904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968129,0.00007389076,0.000197546,0.0006129432,0.00005135549,0.0001247105,0.000007516332,0.00001518375,0.002103893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4183896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05999279552421096,"score_gpt":0.2769992554757469,"score_spread":0.2170064599515359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}