{"id":"W1967352877","doi":"10.1007/s10270-006-0039-3","title":"Producing robust use case diagrams via reverse engineering of use case descriptions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software & Systems Modeling","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Use Case Diagram; Construct (python library); Reverse engineering; Software engineering; Readability; Process (computing); Use Case Points; Software development process; Set (abstract data type); Software development; Separation of concerns; Unified Modeling Language; Industrial engineering; Programming language; Class diagram; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00747777,0.001853066,0.001140968,0.005090942,0.0007635913,0.003395363,0.002364697,0.001678057,0.00621821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05135439,0.001790735,0.002344802,0.001690872,0.001032653,0.002602576,0.002743919,0.002409896,0.002767192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001117092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003255634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005063591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008174209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892381,0.003262302,0.001031723,0.001014011,0.005085846,0.0003679312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548911,0.02402745,0.003288451,0.00863739,0.008865234,0.000290299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003161181,0.0005480402,0.006328726,0.002171942,0.0003375528,0.003273954,0.002412118,0.1209381,0.06680612,0.04236593,0.01177033,0.742731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002455337,0.0004017494,0.003025329,0.0008735345,0.0005566021,0.002799035,0.001077075,0.7361068,0.1258017,0.0437279,0.08513051,0.0002542388],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327057,0.0001114398,0.9758465,0.0001177081,0.00004223769,0.00101388,0.0007490052,0.006321941,0.002526672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06861395,0.0002295036,0.924208,0.0000646328,0.00001316405,0.0005583798,0.002865215,0.001420936,0.002026322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00747777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03954673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.114655541520691,"score_gpt":0.2728405731165398,"score_spread":0.1581850315958488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}