{"id":"W1967416460","doi":"10.1139/x06-054","title":"Selecting models for capturing tree-size effects on growthresource relationships","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relative growth rate; Biology; Growth rate; Beech; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253945,0.00009679868,0.000131274,0.0002846681,0.0007976867,0.0000628175,0.0003348606,0.00009343067,0.0001038833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000771832,0.00008872645,0.00007830234,0.0003195531,0.0001591799,0.0002073564,0.00003216183,0.0006080136,0.00006201385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006893007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001564525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01206562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4247189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984061,0.0001828623,0.000247058,0.0001719419,0.000341477,0.0006505349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982388,0.001109026,0.00008815908,0.0001451725,0.00005495517,0.0003638807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091337,0.00005523369,0.6107337,0.00005420325,0.00003824681,0.0003021269,0.0006064033,0.2321534,0.0001068104,0.1018591,0.05165961,0.002321905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121834,0.0005058058,0.7715043,0.00007387803,0.00001610794,0.00003990674,0.0001340199,0.00276472,0.0004133592,0.2109149,0.01266563,0.0001551997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618292,0.000080943,0.002063905,0.001219895,0.0001370328,0.0004161601,0.000002225101,0.000006581508,0.034244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959287,0.000001767103,0.0008758593,0.00006207864,0.0001960867,0.00002253637,0.000001697036,0.00001779952,0.002893488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4126533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03728407993947502,"score_gpt":0.2634052090225319,"score_spread":0.2261211290830569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}