{"id":"W1967483598","doi":"10.2478/v10089-010-0017-y","title":"The Quality of Life of Suburbanities: A Case Study of the Gdańsk Agglomeration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic series","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Quality (philosophy); Economies of agglomeration; Meaning (existential); Government (linguistics); Quality of life (healthcare); Sociology; Marketing; Regional science; Business; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Mathematics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198916,0.0001557056,0.0004350621,0.0000717069,0.0002279039,0.0000121784,0.0003092093,0.0001642674,0.001022357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001657151,0.0001055566,0.0003088549,0.00008966211,0.001154699,0.00002812726,0.00005539909,0.000256999,0.000008426684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008492064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003228287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02038638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001128045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979143,0.0005289516,0.0009991264,0.0002416521,0.0001388063,0.0001772009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972295,0.0007996925,0.001110613,0.0007026728,0.0001171089,0.00004042305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007383105,0.001001436,0.9506577,0.00008325325,0.0007577157,0.000002756861,0.01918564,0.00002497918,0.001012374,0.0188335,0.00529887,0.002403468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001391897,0.0007477571,0.873135,0.00001396429,0.00007310631,0.00002769184,0.1126209,8.963605e-7,0.0003737166,0.001606949,0.009838307,0.0001698615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912214,0.0002377258,0.000002463257,0.0008521721,0.001248307,0.0004246518,0.00006195141,0.00001826722,0.005933092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.0000472035,0.00004090674,0.00006331973,0.00008080872,0.00004616626,0.000002181447,0.00001196782,0.0002977203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02187541166482999,"score_gpt":0.3005548548614622,"score_spread":0.2786794431966322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}