{"id":"W1967492164","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.054","title":"Turbulent Schmidt numbers for CFD analysis with various types of flowfield","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":512,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations; Schmidt number; Computational fluid dynamics; Turbulence; Scalar (mathematics); Mechanics; Reynolds number; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Meteorology; Physics; Geometry; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002124115,0.0001738213,0.0002671037,0.000004050069,0.0001056651,0.000006801429,0.000155866,0.00005512174,0.002047683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006391897,0.0001318913,0.000138564,0.0002692354,0.0001976894,0.00006095389,0.00009009273,0.00006387621,0.0001038448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003705202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002828926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001163578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987596,0.00001154879,0.0002460649,0.0003303381,0.0003238641,0.0003285302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994399,0.00007583741,0.0001077849,0.0002853379,0.000003051338,0.00008811832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000246315,0.0006306873,0.8026776,0.00003119213,0.001533613,0.00003207002,0.001513041,0.1693287,0.001555007,0.000155927,0.002825982,0.01946985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00139226,0.0009430527,0.8727996,0.0000207679,0.001468815,0.000005391237,0.0008545327,0.004808935,0.003843924,0.0002560244,0.1128436,0.0007631392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9029476,0.0002150285,0.08796505,0.0003477806,0.00004625226,0.0003741559,0.000003839236,0.00002881299,0.008071501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389458,0.00006962301,0.05822769,0.0002127843,0.00003345311,0.0000263008,0.000005648232,0.00001637392,0.002462299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1645198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004430788033221972,"score_gpt":0.1956772679627665,"score_spread":0.1912464799295445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}