{"id":"W1967492164","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.054","title":"Turbulent Schmidt numbers for CFD analysis with various types of flowfield","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":512,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations; Schmidt number; Computational fluid dynamics; Turbulence; Scalar (mathematics); Mechanics; Reynolds number; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Meteorology; Physics; Geometry; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111226,0.0009611941,0.0005002312,0.001455324,0.0008742944,0.0009342835,0.001067217,0.0005032828,0.002067849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004870426,0.0004282462,0.0006651604,0.001144623,0.0009066072,0.001753935,0.0009109987,0.001522574,0.0004861569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007346215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001178409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001903618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004397248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995733,0.0001211218,0.00003784859,0.00003014193,0.0001965224,0.00004104634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.0006942081,0.00008546617,0.0001956415,0.0002355122,0.00009411873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002445367,0.0002644264,0.003342706,0.0003712032,0.00005955325,0.0001966914,0.0002928729,0.5651504,0.02908758,0.2663563,0.005201475,0.1294323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001566672,0.00004447873,0.0006694688,0.00002019917,0.00001185842,0.00003279447,0.00002420415,0.9761384,0.006974529,0.01404293,0.001994003,0.00003155732],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721714,0.0009480801,0.916578,0.0001941793,0.0003010627,0.0001743044,0.0003655893,0.0008885933,0.008378771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5345396,0.001112641,0.4548494,0.00006901891,0.0002012828,0.0004594103,0.0007569693,0.0008072442,0.007204354],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002067849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006917596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004430788033221972,"score_gpt":0.1956772679627665,"score_spread":0.1912464799295445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}