{"id":"W1967495676","doi":"10.3992/jgb.5.1.115","title":"Evaluating Institutional Green Building Policies: A Mixed-Methods Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Green Building","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Alberta; McMaster University; Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Green building; Sustainable development; Work (physics); Business; Capacity building; Sustainability; Higher education; Environmental planning; Political science; Engineering; Economic growth; Architectural engineering; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003850588,0.0003553624,0.0005368274,0.0007235828,0.0003243288,0.0001746939,0.0006020336,0.0002117738,0.00004842257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003939463,0.0003285424,0.0003005641,0.0006431365,0.0001114933,0.0006682674,0.0001360663,0.001323366,0.000002901978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003431729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002970186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002413364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007918223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972389,0.0001680079,0.0009410328,0.0002490808,0.0007559332,0.0006470503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983343,0.000324705,0.0003689294,0.0003148858,0.0003609353,0.0002961794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003486378,0.00009961073,0.002305358,0.0003597019,0.0003231877,0.00007588234,0.0007180568,0.1284648,0.6047926,0.01417013,0.0006745029,0.2479813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003911651,0.000590982,0.01434622,0.0008318988,0.0005391394,0.004106299,0.001553726,0.8467705,0.06368077,0.01925002,0.04238683,0.002031999],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6410119,0.0003523528,0.3559765,0.0001261177,0.001356598,0.0001357104,0.000002549012,0.000108934,0.0009293755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5243723,0.000021871,0.4742734,0.00004880118,0.001148238,0.00000763523,9.826152e-7,0.00004762946,0.00007915498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03358124998610414,"score_gpt":0.3697031168003028,"score_spread":0.3361218668141987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}