{"id":"W1967498048","doi":"10.2118/157950-pa","title":"Validation of Predicted Cumulative Sand and Sand Rate Against Physical-Model Test","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology","topic":"Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perforation; Geotechnical engineering; Flow (mathematics); Mechanics; Deformation (meteorology); Geology; Computer simulation; Coupling (piping); Production rate; Volumetric flow rate; Materials science; Engineering; Composite material; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064878,0.0005576368,0.0005084259,0.0004607148,0.0002943464,0.0005570719,0.001052239,0.0008259172,0.001609227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001947724,0.00027508,0.000512161,0.0002607885,0.000426972,0.0004794819,0.0002986652,0.0003570666,0.0003785782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001163309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006963216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01520773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006949815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999697,0.0000519857,0.00002535957,0.0000742777,0.0001103837,0.00004100064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989457,0.0005284515,0.0001041628,0.0001676778,0.0002207916,0.00003326861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005899008,0.00004286152,0.005351802,0.00002203096,0.000007940266,0.00003422593,0.00001361613,0.9882752,0.003873464,0.0001435982,0.00006904662,0.002107251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001085016,0.00005228956,0.002352124,0.000003575637,0.000003434603,0.00001199018,0.000009734367,0.9913993,0.005970005,0.00007205487,0.0001051305,0.000009582682],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676124,0.00005460001,0.02711791,0.0000643046,0.0000151248,0.00007005046,0.0009124973,0.0006573717,0.003495707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969837,0.0000161264,0.002444627,0.000004735102,7.193902e-7,0.00003323071,0.0002129561,0.00001659324,0.0002872902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01520773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03023845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007214538066040184,"score_gpt":0.2114213453395669,"score_spread":0.2042068072735267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}