{"id":"W1967520101","doi":"10.3141/1798-09","title":"Test Method for Appraising Future Durability of New Concrete Bridge Decks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Bridge deck; Structural engineering; Permeability (electromagnetism); Engineering; Deck; Test method; Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Composite material; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00328801,0.000219271,0.0005151469,0.0004033584,0.0003166556,0.00006338352,0.0007959556,0.0001812308,0.0002423663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000367148,0.0001730899,0.00049222,0.001678356,0.0002871637,0.0003368094,0.000003812627,0.001452528,0.00001057278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001044334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001955661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955751,0.0004803781,0.001285608,0.0002984906,0.001700814,0.0006596239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937656,0.002915271,0.0002697143,0.0004765922,0.002180008,0.0003927997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001505837,0.0006745964,0.0852336,0.003733299,0.0008744561,0.00004142426,0.01471978,0.0119436,0.3446098,0.01704392,0.1191572,0.4004625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002067825,0.0005204144,0.914788,0.0002635224,0.0001039667,6.274916e-7,0.0009171225,0.00651586,0.01179063,0.01001129,0.05272189,0.0002988202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889367,0.0004793285,0.1039512,0.004155833,0.0004951839,0.001486851,0.0002262325,0.00005368396,0.0002149565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018527,0.0006035857,0.09643572,0.00002148908,0.0005391904,0.0000954061,0.00001291517,0.00006771067,0.0003712422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7058399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1322540085795805,"score_gpt":0.4163655213829907,"score_spread":0.2841115128034102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}