{"id":"W1967598978","doi":"10.1163/1569163053084360","title":"Reading `Opium of the People': Expression, Protest and the Dialectics of Religion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Dialectic; Hegelianism; Capitalism; Opium; Phrase; Expression (computer science); Metaphor; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000516511,0.00004684903,0.000149732,0.000009216625,0.0004795197,0.000009983166,0.0001550478,0.0001400444,0.000038789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004339511,0.00002625279,0.000100623,0.00008136644,0.003325646,0.0000504674,0.00005323994,0.0002022678,0.000003396186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002820249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006647455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005499644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000142932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989299,0.0005023517,0.0001986924,0.0000897781,0.0001256612,0.0001536858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974225,0.002222467,0.00006279268,0.0001187067,0.0001332021,0.00004030933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001637962,0.00003774383,0.004690984,0.00001328078,0.000007489571,6.38643e-8,0.05225199,0.00000209746,0.001904308,0.9352647,0.005669498,0.0001414681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002610889,0.0002424861,0.03442336,0.0003054108,0.00024097,0.00001857496,0.09053147,0.0005494951,0.01354666,0.6797355,0.1773004,0.0004947821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7754831,0.0005503983,0.0007029394,0.1981421,0.0006719253,0.0004775411,0.000004838076,0.00003202731,0.02393514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979843,0.0004552231,0.0002173272,0.0008885488,0.0001998699,0.00001883417,2.728706e-7,0.000003313813,0.0002322573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01501301138396953,"score_gpt":0.3504816575720221,"score_spread":0.3354686461880526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}