{"id":"W1967663292","doi":"10.1007/s10212-010-0054-1","title":"Using analogy to improve abstract conditional reasoning in adolescents: not as easy as it looks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Logical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Verbal reasoning; Qualitative reasoning; Analytic reasoning; Adaptive reasoning; Case-based reasoning; Reasoning system; Scientific reasoning; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Model-based reasoning; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Cognition; Knowledge representation and reasoning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002365727,0.00007774692,0.0001412385,0.0002903796,0.0001148683,0.00002847087,0.0002804919,0.00005438081,0.00106144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014641,0.00008209483,0.00005310572,0.0001910539,0.0001944219,0.0001406168,0.00001427329,0.0004283365,0.0001726409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006963217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009638712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007280342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000717224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985188,0.0003462374,0.0005336569,0.0001503508,0.000264339,0.0001865945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988697,0.00005972069,0.0003399934,0.0001135723,0.0004131366,0.0002039421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000852632,0.007253266,0.1193992,0.0001156467,0.0001802125,0.0001516646,0.1262917,0.00006730795,0.3396287,0.2270714,0.03045673,0.1485317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008128858,0.0002805172,0.9148049,0.0005397316,0.00002655015,0.0001431685,0.01070106,0.000001400912,0.0010607,0.01437604,0.05700522,0.0002478535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.920316,0.00002091232,0.0003777964,0.01159148,0.004058181,0.00009065384,9.49995e-7,0.000004142839,0.06353994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866338,0.00000979272,0.006044907,0.006210162,0.0006979799,9.435911e-7,0.000002074848,0.00001039957,0.0003898845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7954057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04892510940353222,"score_gpt":0.4276115385200462,"score_spread":0.378686429116514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}