{"id":"W1967772295","doi":"10.1063/1.2202242","title":"Analytical and numerical calculations of the magnetic force microscopy response: A comparison","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physics","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetic force microscope; Micromagnetics; Magnet; Magnetic field; Magnetic domain; Dipole; Demagnetizing field; Bar (unit); Discretization; Physics; Ferromagnetism; Computational physics; Materials science; Condensed matter physics; Magnetization; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082213,0.0000999512,0.0002330273,0.00002387845,0.0000987457,0.00002561885,0.0001578723,0.00002863842,0.00002382257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001108465,0.00007251862,0.0001254911,0.0002268898,0.0001376176,0.00003302914,0.00004742142,0.0001950568,0.000001424984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001617266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005616309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002748473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.392316e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992297,0.00001953109,0.0003987244,0.0000877358,0.0001427004,0.0001215518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999294,0.00007770638,0.0003375256,0.0001741929,0.00007720731,0.00003935257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003695942,0.0007356197,0.02865694,0.00002091625,0.00008823515,3.014942e-7,0.0002949766,0.0122969,0.5310275,0.4130399,0.0102686,0.003200542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002254279,0.0004352259,0.05734003,0.0001212708,0.0005538971,0.00001163671,0.0005690219,0.05531433,0.6898206,0.1622715,0.03073071,0.0005775217],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969115,0.00004576301,0.09950333,0.000188931,0.00002434132,0.000177038,0.00002527806,0.000006472545,0.003117313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936612,7.562839e-7,0.006039565,0.00002234589,0.0001420464,0.000005553248,0.000002928981,0.00001122962,0.0001143818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2507684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2957223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007630098024365205,"score_gpt":0.2827363066992619,"score_spread":0.2751062086748967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}