{"id":"W1967778497","doi":"10.1139/f2011-027","title":"Comparison of the performance of scale and otolith microchemistry as fisheries research tools in a small upland catchment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; University of Leeds","keywords":"Otolith; Salmo; Biogeochemical cycle; Aragonite; Environmental science; Sediment; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Drainage basin; Environmental chemistry; Oceanography; Chemistry; Geology; Biology; Mineralogy; Geography; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006583529,0.0002904517,0.0002922885,0.001042132,0.0004926256,0.0006830218,0.0004392999,0.0002604605,0.0004514739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001327169,0.0002176855,0.0002040895,0.001039499,0.0007891516,0.0003895156,0.000703123,0.0001201431,0.0001298881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000676841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2220274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996156,0.00008159214,0.00002427935,0.0001125002,0.00008595948,0.00008007042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991454,0.0002252581,0.0002069432,0.00004370173,0.0002183031,0.0001604252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492832,0.0001342623,0.9581286,0.0000313268,0.0000658581,0.0003768671,0.001784018,0.0005474039,0.02567724,0.00006215544,0.00006804406,0.01263148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001044892,0.0001193287,0.9974825,0.000002284024,0.00001520528,0.00005239886,0.0005669037,0.0009755877,0.0006726148,0.00001656752,0.00008255345,0.000003710421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998136,0.000007925314,0.00004118205,0.000004935298,2.019649e-7,0.000003302194,0.00001849952,0.000002172197,0.0001080754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999517,0.00001430817,0.0002690611,0.000005759226,0.000001199476,0.000005996436,0.00005895839,0.000001833394,0.0001259331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1621324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06821189536697664,"score_gpt":0.2722906344976024,"score_spread":0.2040787391306257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}