{"id":"W1967863885","doi":"10.1007/s00199-008-0433-x","title":"The bargaining set of a large game","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Class (philosophy); Bondareva–Shapley theorem; Core (optical fiber); Combinatorial game theory; Mathematics; Equivalence relation; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Von Neumann architecture; Game theory; Sequential game; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045356,0.001338289,0.002419195,0.002065395,0.002612992,0.00792833,0.002392417,0.003715729,0.01537575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01324662,0.001013338,0.001361298,0.002003432,0.006180579,0.007843137,0.003349922,0.004205064,0.001261293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003024257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002432845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001651627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001008677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959863,0.002241803,0.0001403304,0.0004645933,0.0007555635,0.0004113067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907563,0.007131265,0.000453308,0.0004643027,0.0004108327,0.0007840289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001595546,0.00001435771,0.00004188438,0.00001785227,0.0000113612,0.0000264128,0.00006885175,0.007312691,0.0001521868,0.990491,0.000653027,0.001194335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001255246,0.000006183151,0.00003420614,0.000007093468,0.000003697921,0.00001325502,0.00002677652,0.02553681,0.00003693254,0.9736583,0.0006582022,0.00000608837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.133899,0.001126102,0.6634004,0.007965633,0.0002505889,0.0002050364,0.0007064482,0.0002690309,0.1921778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111633,0.0012206,0.05019309,0.0007582212,0.0003896506,0.0005404833,0.0004495406,0.0001146617,0.03517039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01537575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05143708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01806392994080188,"score_gpt":0.2253853913488535,"score_spread":0.2073214614080517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}