{"id":"W1967994418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.019","title":"Wood and non-wood pulp production: Comparative ecological footprinting on the Canadian prairies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pulp (tooth); Ecological footprint; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Taiga; Paper production; Wood production; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Biology; Sustainability; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500014,0.0001749954,0.0002120935,0.00001812728,0.0006809065,0.00009678865,0.0001868223,0.0001339194,0.001097925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001191397,0.0001172497,0.00005115752,0.00006509605,0.0008580762,0.0001387183,0.0001836408,0.0002577558,0.0002166114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001001681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002866941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008518507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2612134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.00008286992,0.0002339498,0.0004228428,0.00006145384,0.0004254318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993739,0.0001715098,0.00008303111,0.0002089158,0.000003855077,0.0001588095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003578526,0.0005174241,0.9753401,0.000004513073,0.00001764276,0.00001125873,0.0004139623,0.01048936,0.00009420646,0.008170761,0.003889205,0.001015729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206714,0.0002343493,0.9829029,0.000001044994,0.000005327871,0.000008244867,0.0004548768,0.0003924191,0.0003735055,0.007524183,0.007815589,0.0001669181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9328458,0.000004674258,0.000001776856,0.008212254,0.00009929489,0.000483404,0.000003114192,0.00002035158,0.05832929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980985,0.000005823552,0.0002094608,0.0007836258,0.00008345614,0.00005405906,0.000003746979,0.000005938168,0.0007554071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01832144692833927,"score_gpt":0.2196290303200162,"score_spread":0.2013075833916769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}