{"id":"W1968114192","doi":"10.1006/jema.2001.0520","title":"Land application of phosphorus-laden sludge: a feasibility analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Phosphorus and nutrient management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Aerobic digestion; Environmental science; Sewage sludge; Phosphorus; Anaerobic digestion; Sewage sludge treatment; Waste management; Sewage treatment; Nutrient; Activated sludge; Sludge bulking; Heavy metals; Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Environmental chemistry; Engineering; Methane","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004797094,0.0001860656,0.0003568088,0.0001634132,0.00007248853,0.00001870501,0.0004557206,0.00004491868,0.003532648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004644199,0.0001625516,0.0003235044,0.0005329426,0.0001579638,0.0002390515,0.0003753591,0.0001231553,0.0002305877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004087997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.036189e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003461717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008041458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978908,0.00005024782,0.0006972044,0.000296979,0.0008175087,0.0002472067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987516,0.00002070786,0.0006311286,0.0004563817,0.000003909971,0.0001362977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001272198,0.002626972,0.9372782,0.00002793743,0.001013412,0.00004249391,0.0002634197,0.004751421,0.002028383,0.000143625,0.004264593,0.04743233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001514698,0.0003135443,0.9378397,0.00001161174,0.0012069,0.00000688535,0.0002277264,0.002823626,0.001479127,0.0004197504,0.05390461,0.0002518072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755979,0.0008697545,0.006902599,0.0002758717,0.0001107208,0.000558122,0.00001869972,0.00001162583,0.0156547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955677,0.001325179,0.001863649,0.0001153566,0.00002249007,0.00001037054,0.000004396791,0.00001250322,0.001078302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04964002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00863066201501439,"score_gpt":0.2062600472439371,"score_spread":0.1976293852289227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}