{"id":"W1968121043","doi":"10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0346:eohfot]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS<sup>*</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":635,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat fragmentation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Extinction debt; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Local extinction; Population size; Environmental science; Biological dispersal; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004248814,0.0001055548,0.0001193366,0.00002071045,0.0003478462,0.00001082981,0.0002062285,0.0001077513,0.01274032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001768917,0.00006633558,0.00006367844,0.0002549082,0.0002434765,0.00007720177,0.00005538848,0.0001354961,0.003289722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007964103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001791403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004069293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001273354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999068,0.000177289,0.0002034234,0.0002450661,0.0001537555,0.0001524232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980746,0.001521706,0.0001039427,0.0002539363,0.000007525387,0.00003831061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008622183,0.001181665,0.9001514,0.0000177766,0.00003546298,0.000001570554,0.0002653986,0.01288553,0.001178829,0.009071521,0.02702437,0.04810028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002861344,0.0007101341,0.9669911,0.000006166403,0.00005752908,0.000003498998,0.00007112735,0.01965325,0.001857388,0.003679148,0.006517201,0.0001673834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729326,0.000007282674,0.0004771915,0.003615316,0.00001900528,0.0008153021,0.000003720835,0.00004970464,0.0220799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963908,0.00001177004,0.0001389741,0.0008674026,0.00003491064,0.002181439,0.000005679552,0.000005488999,0.0003635577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06683967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01381860656140041,"score_gpt":0.2259038430068273,"score_spread":0.2120852364454269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}