{"id":"W1968130027","doi":"10.4102/hts.v67i1.941","title":"The socio-rhetorical force of ‘truth talk’ and lies: The case of 1 John","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Witness; Reflexive pronoun; Lying; Identity (music); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Gospel; Negotiation; Style (visual arts); Aesthetics; Law; Literature; Art; Political science; Linguistics; Theology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008224755,0.0003347652,0.0008254047,0.00005256635,0.002017863,0.0000304918,0.0003970758,0.0000881055,0.0001524753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003611893,0.0001285024,0.0002259837,0.0001454053,0.01246709,0.0001145757,0.001410868,0.0002662544,0.000006039974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003368267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008931516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002018576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008085068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998005,0.0002693825,0.0007111521,0.0003524765,0.000203839,0.0004581108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933082,0.005213055,0.0003979978,0.0003281966,0.0007129721,0.00003951403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002516767,0.0001095602,0.0008988362,0.0001080601,0.00192841,0.00005439901,0.09695206,8.744776e-7,0.000006700213,0.8801146,0.0130125,0.006562295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004591074,0.001926812,0.002784503,0.00006860811,0.0002871845,0.00007198515,0.665735,0.00002939385,0.0001473606,0.3029091,0.02525372,0.0003272799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7197501,0.2030182,0.00003117009,0.004226486,0.001464462,0.0007146595,0.00003972255,0.0001488961,0.07060626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661635,0.03207459,0.00007247558,0.0003369885,0.0001820621,0.0001354455,5.377901e-7,0.00001081426,0.001023583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5772055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1795771560067459,"score_gpt":0.3233005088888657,"score_spread":0.1437233528821198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}