{"id":"W1968130027","doi":"10.4102/hts.v67i1.941","title":"The socio-rhetorical force of ‘truth talk’ and lies: The case of 1 John","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Witness; Reflexive pronoun; Lying; Identity (music); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Gospel; Negotiation; Style (visual arts); Aesthetics; Law; Literature; Art; Political science; Linguistics; Theology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006650119,0.0004324639,0.0004799629,0.001727495,0.02874943,0.01247246,0.00130962,0.005773399,0.002538814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01250257,0.0005243431,0.0002117317,0.001596202,0.07557867,0.009715227,0.005999116,0.008424943,0.0003871649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006481327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003368195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008647333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01344089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896407,0.007461903,0.0002124571,0.0005728216,0.00124666,0.0008654452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900379,0.008078969,0.0007497293,0.0003152112,0.0004519235,0.0003663472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178747,0.000008818592,0.0002033138,0.00004079103,0.000002755245,0.0008778236,0.4507793,0.00004726502,0.0001101565,0.5444807,0.001648095,0.001783135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000236079,0.00004965672,0.001206266,0.0004769205,0.00002263512,0.00171703,0.5094496,0.000558708,0.001304045,0.1835684,0.3015578,0.00006531213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3002045,0.005626178,0.005625832,0.04350686,0.0006898562,0.00004103168,0.00002809852,0.00003708219,0.6442405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848765,0.0005923934,0.0004566797,0.00121484,0.0001282564,0.0000145256,0.00000517648,0.00002583237,0.01268575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02874943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0470255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1795771560067459,"score_gpt":0.3233005088888657,"score_spread":0.1437233528821198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}