{"id":"W1968140052","doi":"10.1122/1.4907743","title":"Rheo-optical response of carbon nanotube suspensions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Rheology","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; KU Leuven","keywords":"Materials science; Carbon nanotube; Rod; Shear flow; Rheology; Newtonian fluid; Couette flow; Nanotube; Dichroism; Shear rate; Rheometer; Composite material; Mechanics; Molecular physics; Optics; Flow (mathematics); Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071403,0.0000819715,0.0002973264,0.0001593633,0.000007319866,0.000004692153,0.000148601,0.0001017458,0.0000329955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003977004,0.00007323765,0.0000568317,0.00008928301,0.00003961071,0.00004896347,0.00004947066,0.0001650475,0.000007414385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006469508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006960252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003606229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003604288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991572,0.0001097725,0.0003917474,0.00004830916,0.0001429061,0.0001500381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992697,0.0001938261,0.00009767729,0.0001384498,0.0001707858,0.0001295207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001507995,0.0000426401,0.0003381649,0.00001556775,0.00007025761,0.0002127649,0.0003552281,0.003513783,0.9733573,0.01955175,0.0006678913,0.0003666742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004011347,0.003732611,0.003948967,0.0001771773,0.0001920268,0.005905102,0.0003568252,0.02931326,0.9348669,0.01238949,0.004630383,0.0004758971],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941764,0.0002345812,0.002847956,0.0002609985,0.001904247,0.00003264581,8.509276e-7,0.00002112516,0.0005211269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955505,0.00001773657,0.004238821,0.00001669403,0.0001022828,3.645398e-7,2.112854e-7,0.00001607727,0.00005727953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03849037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2986545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01654921345085356,"score_gpt":0.2304577526041493,"score_spread":0.2139085391532957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}