{"id":"W1968243881","doi":"10.1057/emr.2010.6","title":"The resource‐based view revisited: Comparative firm advantage, willingness‐based isolating mechanisms and competitive heterogeneity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Management Review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Competitive advantage; Imitation; Factoring; Industrial organization; Resource (disambiguation); Incentive; Comparative advantage; Business; Product (mathematics); Resource-based view; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008858502,0.0006567705,0.001195826,0.003438387,0.000614517,0.004686151,0.002221956,0.002780531,0.006862819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01243926,0.0003171264,0.001008262,0.001680951,0.008202533,0.007384372,0.002632673,0.001851708,0.0003637091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001954178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007469527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005570584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004013708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964972,0.001706838,0.0001288964,0.0005268169,0.0007649926,0.0003752277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860394,0.00925642,0.002155007,0.001338967,0.0007834935,0.0004267718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002737737,0.00002301414,0.001143477,0.0001058178,0.00005409457,0.000114863,0.0002272006,0.002830554,0.0008060071,0.9828266,0.000145392,0.01169568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547358,0.0001275152,0.005290175,0.00009343486,0.00007284858,0.0003587146,0.0004314237,0.01292988,0.0008764085,0.9758806,0.003854975,0.00004862541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5442035,0.01071056,0.2228659,0.01442417,0.0001049711,0.0001743252,0.0001332383,0.0001214236,0.2072619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942989,0.000522451,0.003893199,0.0002338951,0.00004020327,0.00004187669,0.00000709113,0.000004810305,0.0009574994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04684877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02644208667073835,"score_gpt":0.2738809319651349,"score_spread":0.2474388452943966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}