{"id":"W1968243881","doi":"10.1057/emr.2010.6","title":"The resource‐based view revisited: Comparative firm advantage, willingness‐based isolating mechanisms and competitive heterogeneity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Management Review","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Competitive advantage; Imitation; Factoring; Industrial organization; Resource (disambiguation); Incentive; Comparative advantage; Business; Product (mathematics); Resource-based view; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003255166,0.0004559528,0.0005020929,0.0001890391,0.0009442696,0.0006656026,0.0006685019,0.00002959784,0.0002240916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009562646,0.0003391484,0.0001642737,0.0009978308,0.0001530656,0.0003291469,0.0006251872,0.0003899953,0.000844361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002444827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000722099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000276047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003420083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974278,0.0002090541,0.000802222,0.0006577909,0.0004471607,0.0004559851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981343,0.0001149449,0.0006534033,0.0007983528,0.0002641292,0.00003492199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058039,0.0001255373,0.0004933276,0.007621971,0.0001161963,0.00004645201,0.00002119713,0.000008407123,0.00007539814,0.9350399,0.01112622,0.04529486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006473362,0.00001808237,0.001592058,0.002599368,0.0002441462,0.000001088775,0.0001745286,0.002921918,0.00001664532,0.0004381789,0.9909067,0.0004399188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005289585,0.01057527,0.008422412,0.003022805,0.0004934705,0.002702641,0.000005206917,0.0004199798,0.9738293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8107572,0.01139515,0.02262835,0.1454605,0.002252545,0.0004578255,0.0007511904,0.0004267555,0.005870387],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02644208667073835,"score_gpt":0.2738809319651349,"score_spread":0.2474388452943966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}