{"id":"W1968252438","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1235)","title":"Density and Activity Characterization of Activated Sludge Flocs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Settling; Activated sludge; Chemistry; Effluent; Inert; Flocculation; Sewage treatment; Wastewater; Mixed liquor suspended solids; Pulp and paper industry; Chemical engineering; Chromatography; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002705692,0.0002754779,0.0001937393,0.001174239,0.0002406543,0.0004097657,0.0002006861,0.0002035484,0.0003691141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006279584,0.0001455448,0.0001465436,0.0004945024,0.0001980499,0.0002474114,0.0002386206,0.0002506031,0.0001752874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002630276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001500563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002990206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996574,0.00003739359,0.00002931085,0.00004527254,0.0001908444,0.00003985245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996183,0.00006934858,0.00006728755,0.00001178682,0.0001843629,0.0000488869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003744492,0.00003221634,0.006682528,0.00002709519,0.000004170045,0.00002953953,0.0001223033,0.0001869702,0.9908572,0.00006836551,0.00002266108,0.001929545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005359379,0.0002808401,0.09680007,0.00001451485,0.00001451289,0.0001899761,0.000281759,0.004541095,0.8969972,0.0000565277,0.0008025304,0.00001561538],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953022,0.0003064378,0.003149378,0.00002161567,0.000004228365,0.0000356724,0.0002467541,0.00002666762,0.0009070819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958487,0.0003127099,0.00249346,0.00001581925,0.000006895683,0.00003165798,0.0005535471,0.00001145493,0.0007256932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002990206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005945623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003440783069075159,"score_gpt":0.1553889405142017,"score_spread":0.1519481574451266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}