{"id":"W1968318198","doi":"10.1504/ijisd.2008.022228","title":"Enacting ecological and collaborative rationality through multiparty collaboration – a case of innovation in governance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Sociology; Rationality; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Management; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0160913,0.0004277432,0.0005265905,0.001201971,0.01531735,0.01239969,0.002141081,0.006304728,0.002892344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01231142,0.0003727558,0.0007458446,0.001447551,0.03661437,0.008075067,0.01588982,0.004256272,0.0005051271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006645172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006825564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005638544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006359724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9748702,0.01794099,0.0004892203,0.001531401,0.002497633,0.00267051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866536,0.008578978,0.001172672,0.001591364,0.0006497964,0.001353517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003561012,0.0000878361,0.001844912,0.00005355709,0.0000118536,0.004556888,0.04980696,0.002352447,0.0005675342,0.9290207,0.0009825649,0.01067917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019304,0.0001959978,0.001632743,0.0002146776,0.00003261923,0.002397517,0.07372411,0.0156223,0.002384397,0.7495826,0.1540175,0.00009362742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4403876,0.0008594882,0.1361742,0.01862727,0.0002060052,0.0003723498,0.00003863174,0.0001503667,0.403184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854466,0.00009221154,0.005763543,0.0002175319,0.00001764212,0.0001054247,0.000005526006,0.00001058349,0.008340986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0160913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08509994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02285017711979585,"score_gpt":0.2756028596440421,"score_spread":0.2527526825242463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}