{"id":"W1968358972","doi":"10.1021/es102551d","title":"Toward a Consistent Evaluative Framework for POP Risk Characterization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hexabromocyclododecane; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Risk assessment; Environmental risk assessment; Environmental health; Environmental science; Risk management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business; Biology; Medicine; Chemistry; Computational biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1934525,0.003992136,0.003538078,0.01079979,0.003380413,0.0166667,0.008240672,0.004669232,0.002217002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1214569,0.00133412,0.002987309,0.004709329,0.009944082,0.01090185,0.007444344,0.00923879,0.0008193838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02466405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008850731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007656261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8838854,0.07751501,0.00866832,0.004428747,0.02378423,0.001718186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8613105,0.06816094,0.008937589,0.009466602,0.05063326,0.001491122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001105858,0.0007342152,0.003651624,0.001539286,0.0003356005,0.0002076583,0.002439822,0.08627287,0.002648695,0.7561898,0.007836534,0.1380333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001211771,0.0004910855,0.001656074,0.00269012,0.000264726,0.0001414747,0.003035597,0.1186011,0.005149568,0.8323036,0.03529972,0.0002457396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002974523,0.0008443423,0.9801257,0.005043048,0.00008199899,0.001093386,0.0001825952,0.0002221835,0.009432187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05394364,0.0007537898,0.9412877,0.0008034039,0.0001006349,0.002052655,0.0002699115,0.00006925649,0.0007190895],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1934525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01031209756070742,"score_gpt":0.2566192866799397,"score_spread":0.2463071891192322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}