{"id":"W1968468882","doi":"10.1177/0309132508094079","title":"Environmental geography: we're not quite home — reviewing the gender gap","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in Human Geography","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Human geography; Gender gap; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006080345,0.0004353074,0.0007846797,0.00448913,0.004293859,0.006506704,0.001352055,0.003079008,0.004970796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01370568,0.0002473663,0.0003189292,0.008831187,0.01152497,0.01209163,0.004130611,0.003349024,0.0005063714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009811906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02555933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05258361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973126,0.001587346,0.00009444544,0.0002363886,0.0003300754,0.0004391402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988373,0.008319088,0.0008740341,0.0002253695,0.001475226,0.0007332613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006068321,0.00007873854,0.01311482,0.00344132,0.00006117456,0.0006199107,0.1007436,0.0003075453,0.0001670377,0.5925444,0.1010115,0.1878492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007637448,0.00005410137,0.02117529,0.009003169,0.00006391099,0.0004138595,0.2171293,0.00009608496,0.00009557683,0.07811055,0.6738306,0.00001991923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03037854,0.4713645,0.001071406,0.4404028,0.005035798,0.00001606881,0.0001366334,0.000009705424,0.05158453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4501537,0.4883882,0.0006928078,0.04789,0.005993394,0.00007036021,0.0001544292,0.00004872678,0.006608389],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05082113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04439270858665046,"score_gpt":0.2483809756091567,"score_spread":0.2039882670225063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}