{"id":"W1968511731","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00387.x","title":"Time dependence of contact angle and its relation to repellency persistence in hydrophobized sand","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soil Science & Plant Nutrition","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Contact angle; Surface energy; Penetration (warfare); Drop (telecommunication); Sessile drop technique; Water repellent; Adsorption; Soil science; Chemistry; Materials science; Environmental science; Composite material; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001278958,0.0001501947,0.00015989,0.0002635015,0.00007518509,0.0002083947,0.00008421813,0.0001171135,0.0009077404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005674987,0.00009660657,0.0001433671,0.0002440247,0.0001379653,0.000217306,0.0001053298,0.0003108155,0.0001030815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000187971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007865622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001791166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998698,0.00001267428,0.000009690158,0.00002308747,0.00005696384,0.00002778442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994488,0.0002118807,0.0001577643,0.00003299968,0.000106928,0.00004169414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001407384,0.00001648918,0.001605667,0.00002652423,0.000006173307,0.00003875975,0.00002886405,0.0001896687,0.9963966,0.00001533632,0.000008488331,0.001526696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000379778,0.0003355866,0.02963955,0.000002820884,0.000009756747,0.00005402427,0.00006395139,0.002650341,0.967004,0.00001840508,0.0002103182,0.000007372853],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986333,0.0001274622,0.0008399424,0.000006346641,0.000002920612,0.000007528534,0.0001104568,0.00001101839,0.0002609318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990593,0.0001001664,0.0004245031,0.000004725537,0.000001472937,0.000007370573,0.0001126978,0.000003689308,0.0002860883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001791166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003561497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007790534004352336,"score_gpt":0.2018048739572811,"score_spread":0.1940143399529288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}