{"id":"W1968580807","doi":"10.1002/ieam.5630030111","title":"Selenium effects: A weight-of-evidence approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Selenium; Population; Relevance (law); Risk analysis (engineering); Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Fishery; Environmental health; Business; Medicine; Political science; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2353225,0.006037808,0.01841156,0.04995384,0.002216402,0.01309665,0.01054464,0.01372737,0.007644654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4792543,0.002146606,0.01377387,0.01643408,0.007130325,0.007684527,0.007196502,0.01051052,0.001303246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01011122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007105388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003467732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003753035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6062562,0.28954,0.04193931,0.0100163,0.05084514,0.001403067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.516515,0.4314185,0.01813408,0.01044368,0.02077344,0.002715345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009753585,0.000610764,0.01699944,0.214179,0.1821657,0.003094297,0.002046304,0.01651447,0.002128294,0.09442858,0.02168193,0.4363975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01044889,0.009456409,0.01186343,0.1307544,0.2122475,0.003015714,0.002805292,0.06125181,0.002510009,0.4322343,0.1228327,0.0005795095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01861959,0.3793773,0.4535025,0.05185813,0.01703542,0.041947,0.004645617,0.001278256,0.03173614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3560327,0.08932793,0.4756954,0.01827511,0.007139732,0.04746098,0.00120355,0.0002351639,0.004629393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2353225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9429835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01508928431114178,"score_gpt":0.2536961862825844,"score_spread":0.2386069019714426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}