{"id":"W1968599496","doi":"10.1139/f07-143","title":"Effect of detritus quality on growth and survival of gizzard shad (<i>Dorosoma cepedianum</i>): potential importance to benthic–pelagic coupling","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; Ohio State University; Ohio Sea Grant College, Ohio State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Trophic level; Detritus; Pelagic zone; Biology; Fishery; Trawling; Benthic zone; Ecology; Zooplankton; Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001268497,0.0002206724,0.0001975202,0.0001441433,0.0001712314,0.0003398445,0.0001773835,0.0001848149,0.0007904374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000362004,0.0001793138,0.0002007971,0.00009982955,0.0002467727,0.0002656334,0.0003445658,0.0002747421,0.0001001832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003131779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001644725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005537281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01788819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999938,0.00001063358,0.000007688414,0.00001868264,0.00000932421,0.0000157927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.00009849591,0.0001556303,0.00002876875,0.00004513546,0.0001478121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003491514,0.00030948,0.4779111,0.00009051743,0.0001252437,0.0002991641,0.0003093431,0.0002381144,0.5110389,0.00004466743,0.00009342941,0.006048519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005199518,0.0003969792,0.9918622,0.000001171356,0.00001977493,0.00003126373,0.00005670289,0.000264886,0.007297121,0.000007012033,0.00005450802,0.000003106468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998764,0.00002307206,0.00001471645,0.000004386125,5.617945e-7,0.000001151756,0.00002286421,7.919008e-7,0.00005596919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995603,0.00002301256,0.00008237257,0.00001267346,0.000001023455,0.000003676589,0.0001004587,0.000001330598,0.0002151151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005537281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01101011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0117721673599166,"score_gpt":0.2426253502063131,"score_spread":0.2308531828463965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}