{"id":"W1968601348","doi":"10.1080/01431160903380565","title":"LiDAR mapping of canopy gaps in continuous cover forests: A comparison of canopy height model and point cloud based techniques","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Bangor University","keywords":"Lidar; Canopy; Point cloud; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Understory; Tree canopy; Cloud cover; Meteorology; Computer science; Cloud computing; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004675056,0.00012011,0.0003084657,0.0002123362,0.00003294464,0.00002606934,0.0002002675,0.00008510119,0.00002053385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001567126,0.0001110928,0.00008446093,0.0001389246,0.000205752,0.0001215845,0.00006986279,0.0003380624,0.000001613464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000127329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001020529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001154517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985084,0.00004141238,0.0006851512,0.0001487132,0.0004768294,0.0001394809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998818,0.0001035446,0.0006727356,0.0001537952,0.0001654558,0.00008649458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425467,0.0001011094,0.01632718,0.00001546335,0.00004244204,0.00003366761,0.001380357,0.007847239,0.8260782,0.00007963109,0.0004687133,0.1474835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008873289,0.0001027422,0.01120823,0.0005193448,0.00002636184,0.0003210387,0.00024694,0.6699807,0.3089028,0.002815561,0.004771948,0.0002169738],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376608,0.0000286255,0.05896534,0.0007074837,0.0001839687,0.00009970737,0.00000644621,0.000008334924,0.002339358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8361672,0.00001051185,0.1636326,0.00008168254,0.00006632322,1.596902e-8,0.000001933102,0.00001141634,0.00002836294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6621335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4530234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01075100997314413,"score_gpt":0.269214789483628,"score_spread":0.2584637795104838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}