{"id":"W1968610783","doi":"10.1007/s00419-008-0239-0","title":"Nonlinear shell-type to beam-type fea simplifications for composite frp poles","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","topic":"Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Nonlinear system; Structural engineering; Type (biology); Shell (structure); Beam (structure); Buckling; Deformation (meteorology); Mixed finite element method; Engineering; Materials science; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003110147,0.0006177588,0.0004719244,0.0004315114,0.0005209851,0.0005568346,0.0009035182,0.0005374546,0.009002697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001554021,0.0002767071,0.0006549612,0.0003238994,0.0003513955,0.0006381387,0.0005474847,0.0009142355,0.002594042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003940009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003093704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002235587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004888133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998881,0.00002496896,0.000004738581,0.00001215995,0.00006013169,0.000009931001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997775,0.00005909632,0.00001723732,0.00006335861,0.00007373878,0.000009024309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594995,0.0001274243,0.0009225881,0.0002727211,0.00003418225,0.0006418882,0.0003223449,0.6112055,0.04464914,0.1776031,0.01757052,0.1464912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001047931,0.00001459943,0.0004437307,0.00001966387,0.000009184192,0.00009331238,0.0000315714,0.9687855,0.004372529,0.01598011,0.01023234,0.000006963609],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02550589,0.0001829873,0.9222519,0.0002056632,0.0001685063,0.00006803969,0.0002993823,0.0006346585,0.05068289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4861165,0.0007021916,0.4425555,0.0002643452,0.0001908377,0.0002637552,0.0007336038,0.001824681,0.06734855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009002697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03011698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01058419897869746,"score_gpt":0.216123417699628,"score_spread":0.2055392187209306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}