{"id":"W1968621060","doi":"10.1029/2009jc005995","title":"Comparison of composite Bragg theory and quad‐polarization radar backscatter from RADARSAT‐2: With applications to wave breaking and high wind retrieval","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Radar; Backscatter (email); Wind speed; Remote sensing; Meteorology; Satellite; Polarization (electrochemistry); Environmental science; Physics; Geology; Aerospace engineering; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001160099,0.0002876543,0.0002631605,0.001017989,0.0001526989,0.0005873322,0.0003935936,0.0003135492,0.0006326627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001604595,0.0001636341,0.0003490154,0.0008953818,0.0003184634,0.0007972414,0.0003462736,0.0003558948,0.0002436818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003818574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000338472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003273868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003058741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995567,0.00007418927,0.00001822113,0.00007568961,0.0002306137,0.00004460567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.0003249783,0.00009289535,0.0001489991,0.0003756769,0.00005288042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002540322,0.0003753222,0.2220768,0.0006436491,0.0003720785,0.0002101683,0.000347651,0.1740289,0.2996239,0.0118568,0.001699786,0.2862246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171664,0.0006929594,0.1540939,0.00003225431,0.00009601207,0.0005017609,0.0002578975,0.7616071,0.07784931,0.003362166,0.001321775,0.00006782651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8181214,0.001105772,0.1722953,0.0001362626,0.00006550702,0.0000768674,0.0005317685,0.0003111109,0.007356014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697402,0.0002762171,0.02923852,0.00002655595,0.0000107228,0.00001693204,0.0004480089,0.00003063073,0.0002122282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003273868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006509662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974788923155524,"score_gpt":0.2960407054348619,"score_spread":0.2762928162033066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}