{"id":"W1968766188","doi":"10.1109/digitalheritage.2013.6743806","title":"Finite element modelling of contact in rubble stone masonry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Masonry; Rubble; Micromodel; Finite element method; Mortar; Structural engineering; Linear elasticity; Geotechnical engineering; Core (optical fiber); Materials science; Geology; Stiffness; Geometry; Engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Porosity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004183416,0.0005503217,0.001005723,0.0007560573,0.0005202978,0.001664561,0.001517113,0.002336293,0.004728744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001429488,0.0006832936,0.0007466065,0.0006363534,0.001009766,0.0006080371,0.0009308294,0.0006162886,0.0008560409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006715974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009278671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01223273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009155406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995741,0.00008244916,0.00002816042,0.00006145359,0.000176503,0.00007734694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994348,0.0003156463,0.00005770179,0.00005533875,0.00009059465,0.00004603609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003547865,0.000043706,0.0009417251,0.00003205024,0.00001179984,0.0001479606,0.0001290931,0.9917684,0.003213956,0.001012838,0.0001041107,0.002558964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004751021,0.00001728092,0.0004029118,0.000006414664,0.000002538541,0.00002560993,0.00004217676,0.9980513,0.0007104579,0.0002385653,0.0004928596,0.000005129206],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6833826,0.0003992273,0.2906703,0.0001705833,0.0000506403,0.0002575003,0.0008600511,0.0007034813,0.02350548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623441,0.0001670053,0.02806741,0.00002903064,0.000006444203,0.0001391507,0.0005634474,0.0001427621,0.00854073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01223273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02432305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01361871927902963,"score_gpt":0.1938712937951611,"score_spread":0.1802525745161314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}