{"id":"W1968801125","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.03.005","title":"Relationship between soil CO2 concentrations and forest-floor CO2 effluxes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Q10; Environmental science; Soil science; Thermal diffusivity; Soil water; Forest floor; Atmospheric sciences; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Botany; Respiration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001512424,0.0002216664,0.0002775939,0.00001566893,0.0004019409,0.00007542065,0.0001335865,0.0002337996,0.00005094531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109599,0.00008050127,0.00007966914,0.0002179011,0.0002381375,0.0002107938,0.0000808589,0.000203121,0.00002873438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001927761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006100922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003322121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01268773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987521,0.00009935936,0.0002833224,0.000348037,0.0001341984,0.000382977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0005770997,0.0001016916,0.00005072324,0.00007376683,0.0002100129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937021,0.00002362353,0.9859353,0.00000446448,0.0000227461,0.000001536257,0.00008819837,0.00005228611,0.002611305,0.007253092,0.0003443949,0.00364371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003198207,0.0002661858,0.9939502,0.000004665265,0.0000709356,0.00006010465,0.000157271,0.0004453306,0.0001613832,0.002648768,0.001692876,0.0002224294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934476,0.0007018241,0.000003272915,0.004700023,0.00007280293,0.0002230841,0.00005086826,0.00009008976,0.0007104437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998189,0.00008122958,0.0001588429,0.000356061,0.0004491484,0.00002989344,0.0003185355,0.000001497195,0.0004158182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7080054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01902231142916071,"score_gpt":0.2201408734203379,"score_spread":0.2011185619911772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}