{"id":"W1968838733","doi":"10.1256/qj.05.154","title":"Analysis of scale dependence of quantitative precipitation forecast verification: A case‐study over the Mackenzie river basin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Predictability; Precipitation; Climatology; Environmental science; Quantitative precipitation forecast; Scale (ratio); Meteorology; Forecast verification; Orography; Quantitative precipitation estimation; Smoothing; Radar; Forecast skill; Statistics; Mathematics; Geology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001849228,0.0002573205,0.0002116386,0.000458148,0.0003835072,0.0005547157,0.0004259702,0.0002551049,0.0003143738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007666549,0.0001709538,0.0003243545,0.000511353,0.0005996453,0.0004426155,0.0003973972,0.0003544534,0.00003551237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001355207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006690214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1424681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1263621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995095,0.0001624502,0.00002889269,0.00007392233,0.0001654043,0.0000599775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958451,0.002641491,0.0004473147,0.0003780638,0.0005833018,0.0001046104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008545893,0.0001906942,0.5184662,0.00008765523,0.0002211796,0.0007113303,0.0005892433,0.4337535,0.01285317,0.001510046,0.0007110072,0.03005131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003413635,0.00009645976,0.2810426,0.000006428477,0.000038753,0.00006567729,0.000229892,0.7123991,0.005301866,0.0005103778,0.000243263,0.00003138607],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986147,0.00001146722,0.001048399,0.00002951372,0.000001064211,0.000005734273,0.00005558286,0.00002685037,0.0002066419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995023,0.000003839182,0.0004043685,0.0000016493,6.007925e-7,0.000001141721,0.00005589566,0.000002485186,0.00002761877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2832776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02464052541105946,"score_gpt":0.2550696461808877,"score_spread":0.2304291207698283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}