{"id":"W1968838733","doi":"10.1256/qj.05.154","title":"Analysis of scale dependence of quantitative precipitation forecast verification: A case‐study over the Mackenzie river basin","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Predictability; Precipitation; Climatology; Environmental science; Quantitative precipitation forecast; Scale (ratio); Meteorology; Forecast verification; Orography; Quantitative precipitation estimation; Smoothing; Radar; Forecast skill; Statistics; Mathematics; Geology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624062,0.0001459029,0.0004822079,0.00005811779,0.0002655862,0.00003052284,0.0004708867,0.0001013426,0.0007581669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001019801,0.00006791846,0.0007398918,0.0008393668,0.0004406762,0.000138371,0.0000140763,0.0002702397,0.000002296373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002517399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001493735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99738,0.0008151049,0.000855818,0.0001864275,0.0005672502,0.0001954204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970294,0.001388464,0.0009778668,0.0002624984,0.0002807808,0.00006095858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001916894,0.0003087107,0.844532,0.000007212312,0.0007335046,0.00001461379,0.004136308,0.1444374,0.00006615929,0.0001795999,0.0001364895,0.005256318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003654798,0.001939314,0.916503,0.000004287941,0.0008904446,0.0000162914,0.003765839,0.07339516,0.00001403264,0.003008459,0.00002080276,0.00007692185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962361,0.0002903355,0.00264483,0.0001547144,0.0001276952,0.0002608721,0.00008676605,0.00000506776,0.000193652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974196,0.000003064129,0.002420475,0.00006842786,0.00005035859,0.000001540193,0.000008107484,0.000002147437,0.00002626917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07197093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8301395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02464052541105946,"score_gpt":0.2550696461808877,"score_spread":0.2304291207698283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}