{"id":"W1968907042","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2014.04.009","title":"Fisheries, ecosystem justice and piracy: A case study of Somalia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Maritime Security and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Somali; Overfishing; Fishing; Livelihood; International waters; Fishery; Argument (complex analysis); Ecosystem approach; State (computer science); Maritime boundary; Ecosystem; Business; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Economics; International law; Ecology; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003401608,0.00009046338,0.0002259797,0.0001357298,0.001526112,0.0001604756,0.0002784065,0.0001144987,0.0009143802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001361602,0.00009545599,0.00002681055,0.000386948,0.0007391819,0.0002979753,0.0001916001,0.0003314656,0.00001591586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008901995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002051619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06400863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2917902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965633,0.001687406,0.0002401814,0.0002842217,0.0007954491,0.0004294986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983464,0.0007193118,0.00005713665,0.0003067295,0.0003796562,0.000190782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002498762,0.001323104,0.05991042,0.002104812,0.00009297288,0.001510644,0.7720563,9.839656e-7,0.0000470632,0.0360811,0.1010946,0.02552818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003880067,0.000573545,0.001583496,0.00002085457,0.00002680034,0.00003353752,0.2250075,0.00006777197,0.000005037644,0.0003905687,0.7717819,0.0001209708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539951,0.0001192663,0.000004482022,0.0006366548,0.0001953828,0.0004241437,0.00001149809,0.00003869248,0.1445748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926109,0.00005889602,0.00006359468,0.00002644122,0.0002594691,0.00004526234,0.000001591938,0.00001249611,0.006921305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6706873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1158723981682313,"score_gpt":0.3826415767255319,"score_spread":0.2667691785573006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}