{"id":"W1968921991","doi":"10.1590/s1519-69842009000100024","title":"A potential recovery of a population of the sand lizard Liolaemus lutzae Mertens, 1938 in an area within its range: a lizard endemic and threatened with extinction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Lizard; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Ecology; Home range; Population; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Endemism; Disturbance (geology); Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004233312,0.000126593,0.0003526154,0.0001046945,0.00004664531,0.000005198229,0.0001725817,0.0001760101,0.00007893085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000568025,0.00007281654,0.000073692,0.0001964134,0.0002472028,0.0001637226,0.0000398263,0.0001727276,8.560299e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004567105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002674101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006335309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003603584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987428,0.0002624347,0.0005114941,0.0001899637,0.0001113403,0.0001820113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990869,0.0000272219,0.0006399736,0.0001443461,0.00003120017,0.00007031357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001593482,0.0001177725,0.7248518,0.000007952879,0.00002799955,0.00001487475,0.0003790452,0.0008227509,0.2538121,0.00001777409,0.00003425841,0.01832012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001241435,0.002167968,0.9915313,0.00007307736,0.00003798936,0.0005664733,0.0001189108,0.0003413167,0.002960817,0.0008240366,0.00003456958,0.0001021553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987836,0.0003640218,0.0001254652,0.0002515197,0.0001635008,0.0001524278,0.000006386073,0.000003722188,0.0001493011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992877,0.0001697684,0.000338083,0.0001172346,0.00004780929,8.319034e-7,0.0000039382,0.000005995811,0.0000286526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2969372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01093181858599659,"score_gpt":0.2321171240924463,"score_spread":0.2211853055064497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}