{"id":"W1968921991","doi":"10.1590/s1519-69842009000100024","title":"A potential recovery of a population of the sand lizard Liolaemus lutzae Mertens, 1938 in an area within its range: a lizard endemic and threatened with extinction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Lizard; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Ecology; Home range; Population; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Endemism; Disturbance (geology); Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002767594,0.000185938,0.0001685046,0.0005073843,0.0004377686,0.0004453918,0.0002616272,0.0003815157,0.001329397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007093502,0.0001119219,0.0001818868,0.0002273345,0.0003587968,0.0003930057,0.0004019199,0.0001758877,0.0002003271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003499555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002582762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006094447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02592784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998881,0.00001862514,0.000009027012,0.00002370697,0.00002307198,0.0000374408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997562,0.00002599661,0.0001242964,0.00002029091,0.00003175326,0.00004159043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011064,0.00008283515,0.9607325,0.0000590814,0.00004288506,0.0008918792,0.001045093,0.0001544219,0.01073102,0.0001566096,0.0002367321,0.0257658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002657839,0.0001252384,0.9972308,0.00001662833,0.00001847966,0.0007391097,0.0004896864,0.0002228532,0.0004031702,0.00004488171,0.0007029732,0.000003571721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986368,0.0001659523,0.00009814052,0.00006336488,0.000002485413,0.000005717248,0.00003883586,0.000006842676,0.0009818133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995447,0.00007642979,0.0001121892,0.00001864581,0.00000276764,0.000003361804,0.00005396264,6.527082e-7,0.0001872793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006094447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01211798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01093181858599659,"score_gpt":0.2321171240924463,"score_spread":0.2211853055064497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}