{"id":"W1968928085","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.07.010","title":"A comparative study of flux-limiting methods for numerical simulation of gas–solid reactions with Arrhenius type reaction kinetics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Kinetics; Arrhenius equation; Limiting; Thermodynamics; Flux (metallurgy); Chemical kinetics; Type (biology); Materials science; Chemistry; Mechanics; Physics; Classical mechanics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Organic chemistry; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002906591,0.000813593,0.001198399,0.000940373,0.001012001,0.001290638,0.00164654,0.001589768,0.001815011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007765954,0.0003891586,0.0008492836,0.0007986173,0.001008417,0.00135379,0.0009067787,0.001082594,0.0003781149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009554974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009696157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004674837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002160431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992124,0.0004581601,0.00003547658,0.0000422533,0.0002029466,0.00004865315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939541,0.004358802,0.000314238,0.0003198337,0.0009002803,0.0001527414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007566957,0.0005657593,0.003544186,0.0005758863,0.00008858948,0.0002338016,0.0004303864,0.8828806,0.01961636,0.04208552,0.0007880785,0.04843416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001697314,0.00005351596,0.0001424191,0.00001275874,0.000005377425,0.00001394029,0.00001721992,0.9951716,0.003001055,0.001025035,0.000531323,0.000008754356],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4292938,0.00420311,0.5364952,0.0007267502,0.0002600673,0.0002655193,0.0002251093,0.001264584,0.02726585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696935,0.001480126,0.1231039,0.0001405143,0.00008604361,0.0002173449,0.0002044092,0.0004813488,0.004592903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004674837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01537168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02336837898134112,"score_gpt":0.2976783512912094,"score_spread":0.2743099723098683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}