{"id":"W1968989015","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.047","title":"Comparing statistical post-processing of regional and global climate scenarios for hydrological impacts assessment: A case study of two Canadian catchments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hydro-Québec","keywords":"Streamflow; Environmental science; Climate change; Representative Concentration Pathways; Climatology; Climate model; Drainage basin; Snowmelt; Downscaling; SWAT model; Meteorology; Geography; Snow; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001006711,0.0001395732,0.0004976722,0.00008863398,0.0001988311,0.000009265111,0.0001624273,0.00006777777,0.00003703957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007480556,0.0001094023,0.00004639526,0.00008194467,0.0003752875,0.0001285984,0.0001647106,0.0001555602,0.000001213132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001141897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003555497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01800483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05065963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984587,0.0001863884,0.0005552158,0.0001955852,0.0001877047,0.0004164102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.0001481907,0.0004485122,0.000100318,0.00004102476,0.0002063735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003433526,0.0003809732,0.9857659,0.00003823046,0.0001349501,0.0004775165,0.0008017016,0.01071434,0.0001492513,0.000319161,0.0001643016,0.000710267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009890665,0.01225273,0.8614346,0.00004593316,0.0007078185,0.00588255,0.001937268,0.1016037,0.00002171083,0.005527867,0.00033776,0.0003574584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977524,0.00002810673,0.000785494,0.0007275974,0.00006958593,0.0002084068,0.00001221961,0.000003303906,0.0004129195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.000008384171,0.00151114,0.000433141,0.00002657546,0.000004115913,0.000002183233,0.00000539387,0.000001551553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1243314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02524993689824567,"score_gpt":0.3173265581251947,"score_spread":0.2920766212269491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}