{"id":"W1968997843","doi":"10.1002/elps.200305453","title":"A quantitative study of continuous flow‐counterbalanced capillary electrophoresis for sample purification","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electrophoresis","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Analyte; Capillary electrophoresis; Chromatography; Electrolyte; Chemistry; Microscale chemistry; Volumetric flow rate; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Electrophoresis; Resolution (logic); Capillary action; Sample preparation; Conductivity; Materials science; Electrode","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005375992,0.001353416,0.0007752347,0.0004968811,0.0005679083,0.001078195,0.001408813,0.0009312194,0.0005370519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004954954,0.0004174353,0.0003055784,0.0004667831,0.001016214,0.0007068827,0.00046923,0.0007550947,0.0003445467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001322567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001399224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001900577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965012,0.001146992,0.0001354932,0.0007107132,0.001319736,0.0001857644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967549,0.001791145,0.0002870417,0.0002862484,0.0007745419,0.0001061015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001705113,0.00007601441,0.0001387117,0.0001478437,0.00002173753,0.00004769976,0.00003576819,0.0003481443,0.9818684,0.0003028679,0.00008144446,0.01676073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002181214,0.0006664144,0.0005812781,0.00001127112,0.00003031679,0.0003067745,0.00001055894,0.0044892,0.9919795,0.00007761055,0.001797847,0.00002759076],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4298253,0.01306284,0.5526386,0.0004148708,0.0002227258,0.001013043,0.0002017131,0.001145517,0.001475349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4224344,0.004406666,0.5701489,0.0001726829,0.00006288418,0.0005043727,0.0003331871,0.0001290408,0.001807889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005375992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0284313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009711146550151747,"score_gpt":0.2291594164229412,"score_spread":0.2194482698727894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}