{"id":"W1968997843","doi":"10.1002/elps.200305453","title":"A quantitative study of continuous flow‐counterbalanced capillary electrophoresis for sample purification","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electrophoresis","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Analyte; Capillary electrophoresis; Chromatography; Electrolyte; Chemistry; Microscale chemistry; Volumetric flow rate; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Electrophoresis; Resolution (logic); Capillary action; Sample preparation; Conductivity; Materials science; Electrode","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003031058,0.0004007594,0.0006312642,0.0002631494,0.0002100022,0.0000408039,0.0003403376,0.0001502166,0.0001085935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002100385,0.0004150086,0.0001873112,0.0008450263,0.00006339598,0.00008864032,0.0000128744,0.00020688,0.00001421245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001972552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009735343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000797961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005015167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975826,0.0001323908,0.0007193749,0.0005192183,0.0003224256,0.0007240156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.0003583306,0.000158851,0.0006643089,0.0002986243,0.0001182215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002306831,0.0004215055,0.0003658013,0.00007718065,0.0003750282,0.000001902635,0.0007018468,0.0001624261,0.9539631,0.006911424,0.03619678,0.0005923476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002702811,0.003889406,0.002053929,0.00002795735,0.0003849096,0.00001866418,0.001647512,0.003188353,0.9276811,0.003621597,0.05376131,0.001022411],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9147335,0.03783641,0.04435336,0.00002828097,0.0001169123,0.001974067,0.00009804427,0.0002518772,0.000607542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737241,0.02157072,0.003292462,0.00003125392,0.00004819943,0.001043588,0.00008775156,0.000121356,0.00008059439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05899057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009711146550151747,"score_gpt":0.2291594164229412,"score_spread":0.2194482698727894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}