{"id":"W1969003208","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.008","title":"Analysis of visual acuity and motion resolvability as measures for optimal visual perception of the workspace","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University; Workplace Safety and Insurance Board","keywords":"Workspace; Kinematics; Computer science; Visual perception; Perception; Motion (physics); Computer vision; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Simulation; Engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005533537,0.0001455601,0.0003377313,0.0001206122,0.00008645954,0.0000140377,0.0001769949,0.0002115565,0.00008575675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005311794,0.0001252672,0.0002606777,0.0002363334,0.0002818347,0.00003927217,0.00007945755,0.0001866491,0.000003176297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002860615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003039145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003183036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007746409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00003916335,0.0003525941,0.0003524419,0.0000813651,0.0001901729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991147,0.000137278,0.0002533703,0.0003723539,0.00006835529,0.00005393253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005946298,0.002214047,0.1386805,0.0001777247,0.004004503,9.160461e-8,0.0095648,0.00614266,0.1967046,0.2097918,0.0003220475,0.4264509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006992143,0.0001103442,0.9916009,0.000002257447,0.0006120729,2.723085e-7,0.00209244,0.002953147,0.0006448959,0.0008172921,0.0003048453,0.0001623707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926342,0.00001499531,0.005124057,0.00006104126,0.0002488666,0.0004785252,0.00003158139,0.00001372122,0.001393028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998461,0.00001537138,0.001278113,0.00004309308,0.00004647154,0.0000606914,0.00003119111,0.00001800768,0.00004602533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5108249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01030850430151586,"score_gpt":0.3044639990843631,"score_spread":0.2941554947828472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}