{"id":"W1969070800","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2014-0538","title":"Three-dimensional behavior of biaxial geogrid in a piled embankment: numerical investigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orthotropic material; Geogrid; Isotropy; Parametric statistics; Truss; Geotechnical engineering; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Tension (geology); Materials science; Geology; Engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Reinforcement; Physics; Ultimate tensile strength","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004729704,0.0001673749,0.0002643326,0.0004003347,0.00004182233,0.00002913013,0.0002144255,0.0002623704,0.0000547667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002483205,0.000172098,0.00008138118,0.0005204395,0.00007095921,0.0001248981,0.00002216432,0.0006911785,0.00001532214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005355443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003840295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005585769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005116334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985179,0.00002771353,0.0005397617,0.000150368,0.0003426862,0.0004215516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986699,0.00003453354,0.0000513279,0.0001816338,0.0001190415,0.0009436196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152024,0.00002454244,0.002339114,0.00001062904,0.000008880935,0.00006962963,0.00003420322,0.9921979,0.0004906314,0.0001800721,0.001284252,0.003352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001179798,0.0001933171,0.04527384,0.0001286139,0.00003460267,0.0003091324,0.00001934716,0.9468827,0.0003104391,0.002024004,0.003227733,0.0004164845],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973768,0.0003883436,0.02407073,0.000451238,0.0006742468,0.0002903885,0.00002337876,0.0002061894,0.0001274749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989187,0.000007299257,0.0008336867,0.0000559124,0.0001120501,0.00002082518,0.00001641788,0.00003117864,0.000003951995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0453152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01782355693814778,"score_gpt":0.2050204154419001,"score_spread":0.1871968585037523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}