{"id":"W1969119503","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2012.007","title":"Economic benefits of controlled tile drainage: Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices, South Nation River basin, Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Tile drainage; Watershed; Environmental science; Drainage; Watershed management; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Geography; Soil water; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02201562,0.0001385048,0.0003215504,0.0002036001,0.0002436667,0.00007029744,0.0003471615,0.00008640494,0.001348481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001470457,0.00009592586,0.000161088,0.00009967808,0.0002055745,0.0008488703,0.0002977788,0.0003610612,0.0002039923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001317724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006006993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009593772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001481604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949896,0.00142437,0.0007599447,0.0002266891,0.001989875,0.0006095126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987044,0.0001057485,0.0005399736,0.0002682578,0.0002049239,0.0001767427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002175331,0.0008247201,0.9333532,0.0000706123,0.000333274,0.000002315507,0.03781071,0.01229751,0.001155876,0.000969011,0.0003418518,0.01066554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01883739,0.0005002755,0.9250626,0.0001009365,0.0004713531,0.00003419396,0.003644931,0.00802762,0.01233002,0.02748443,0.002951682,0.0005545742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932854,0.00003351216,0.0000482528,0.0003265125,0.0002622216,0.000594235,0.0000129893,0.000005953624,0.005430922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988517,0.00001784378,0.0004301939,0.00001505844,0.0001442381,0.0000249551,0.00003362463,0.00001234299,0.0004701011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03416578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1506853037101128,"score_gpt":0.3766517596147942,"score_spread":0.2259664559046814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}