{"id":"W1969119503","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2012.007","title":"Economic benefits of controlled tile drainage: Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices, South Nation River basin, Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Tile drainage; Watershed; Environmental science; Drainage; Watershed management; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Geography; Soil water; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005729844,0.0002028599,0.0001763179,0.0002466563,0.0009409658,0.000589531,0.0004713819,0.0001777277,0.0009075371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001378289,0.0001478516,0.0002359398,0.0005694295,0.000733913,0.0002702237,0.0003223858,0.0002184065,0.00006074251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0236981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01411284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8335968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994866,0.0001086958,0.0000179243,0.00006143491,0.0002360919,0.00008940236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991753,0.0001295969,0.0001951199,0.00004565626,0.0002744784,0.0001798898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042768,0.005418011,0.7932175,0.0003583686,0.00036736,0.001380582,0.003191039,0.0244635,0.04486873,0.002004855,0.004371037,0.1160821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003713674,0.002828177,0.9735638,0.00002391857,0.0001353198,0.0001005236,0.001876178,0.008905053,0.004831335,0.0003325024,0.00699403,0.00003783128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982111,0.00002458952,0.0001201445,0.00004728887,0.000001102768,0.00008669208,0.0001700252,0.000004394055,0.001334822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961861,0.0001095611,0.0009384097,0.00002268379,0.000001775172,0.00008058731,0.000401416,0.000003907552,0.002255568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1664032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3347663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1506853037101128,"score_gpt":0.3766517596147942,"score_spread":0.2259664559046814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}