{"id":"W1969132186","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0108539","title":"Listening In on the Past: What Can Otolith δ18O Values Really Tell Us about the Environmental History of Fishes?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; European Commission; Sight Research UK; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Otolith; δ18O; Fish stock; Fishery; Pleuronectes; Environmental science; Salinity; Stock assessment; Oceanography; Stable isotope ratio; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Fishing; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129988,0.000599701,0.0005605801,0.001169676,0.0003402448,0.002436721,0.0007044778,0.0007987535,0.001575737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007733353,0.0003540545,0.0003766225,0.001156569,0.001665555,0.003883124,0.0005802211,0.0007664016,0.0005731557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004719306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006602264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999777,0.00006084546,0.00001908763,0.00008047856,0.00003372286,0.00002885619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998073,0.0006145727,0.0005324215,0.0002473809,0.0003549042,0.0001777053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003303754,0.00004764237,0.8380929,0.0004438561,0.0004554559,0.0002120418,0.001535468,0.002583937,0.007692183,0.001520049,0.002879428,0.1442065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009518771,0.0001438191,0.9731972,0.0003176077,0.0001424998,0.000242524,0.002023328,0.004350232,0.001721798,0.01024248,0.00751919,0.00008966264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605857,0.01513755,0.008263953,0.004041114,0.0003270611,0.00001529595,0.002091664,0.0001046611,0.009433007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897065,0.005616485,0.00219001,0.0005428201,0.0002394684,0.00001384038,0.0009374861,0.0000591042,0.0006941696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006602264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01312768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02877910838139858,"score_gpt":0.1987355817425115,"score_spread":0.1699564733611129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}