{"id":"W1969194638","doi":"10.1139/p10-019","title":"Nonlinear vibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers by considering the Hertzian contact theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Physics; Timoshenko beam theory; Nonlinear system; Stiffness; Vibration; Contact mechanics; Mechanics; Beam (structure); Deflection (physics); Normal mode; Contact force; Softening; Classical mechanics; Optics; Materials science; Composite material; Acoustics; Finite element method; Thermodynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001787998,0.0001064622,0.0001666117,0.0000322424,0.0001679758,0.00004806177,0.0002451687,0.00003754683,0.0001489744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006847643,0.00008583883,0.0001178414,0.0001190464,0.0001353378,0.0001171278,0.000009036303,0.0003283593,0.000002959314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000282232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007097424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004264026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001238382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993823,0.00002583345,0.0002616252,0.00008201768,0.00006619812,0.0001820546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991592,0.00005175414,0.000298102,0.0002050578,0.0001283408,0.0001575682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007907456,0.00002122939,0.002790198,0.00000664654,0.00006790255,0.000001180548,0.000630754,0.0000248281,0.9291253,0.05666369,0.004903005,0.005757361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002841498,0.00005987729,0.0002168367,0.0000507676,0.0000462541,0.000008130753,0.0005773217,0.0002988448,0.9539503,0.01946223,0.02488449,0.0001607769],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737865,0.00007067442,0.0239428,0.0002715922,0.0001938888,0.0001726953,0.000227423,0.000004991564,0.001329475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973255,0.000002000732,0.002181171,0.0001115931,0.0002337144,0.000003350998,0.0000180725,0.00001965169,0.0001049085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03720145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.644596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00500192925485093,"score_gpt":0.2273974752894582,"score_spread":0.2223955460346072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}