{"id":"W1969312047","doi":"10.1109/tcomm.2002.801465","title":"Analytical level crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Nakagami fading channels","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","topic":"Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fading; Nakagami distribution; Fade; Diversity combining; Maximal-ratio combining; Rayleigh fading; Channel (broadcasting); Statistics; Diversity gain; Diversity scheme; Fading distribution; Level crossing; Telecommunications; Envelope (radar); Channel state information; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Wireless; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001101456,0.0001415696,0.0001633305,0.0002737987,0.001023839,0.00009432289,0.0002410921,0.00009994095,0.00001721948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001449324,0.0001711061,0.0000530833,0.0003452786,0.0001259508,0.00041125,0.000008798517,0.0002477709,0.000005819383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001586538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007284168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003386095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002143252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992759,0.00004339527,0.0002716569,0.0001568172,0.00006588545,0.0001863393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990371,0.0002913768,0.00003457953,0.0005180102,0.00006267204,0.00005623162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008126619,0.0001973068,0.0001214411,0.00006798901,0.00005912258,8.824098e-7,0.004024759,0.9793305,0.002249322,0.0007878049,0.0001514729,0.01300126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003364256,0.00002332657,0.00011513,0.00008378253,0.00002536015,0.000006345724,0.0001675669,0.9923527,0.005969741,0.0002303191,0.0004827167,0.0002066494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00335597,0.0001696959,0.9943424,0.0003220666,0.0001049038,0.0004853547,0.00009850858,0.0003164139,0.0008046965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971319,0.0004940784,0.02763153,0.00002381161,0.00001418358,0.0001850607,0.00001178464,0.00002770755,0.0002928118],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7874645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08259165893051813,"score_gpt":0.2958363710545022,"score_spread":0.2132447121239841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}