{"id":"W1969312047","doi":"10.1109/tcomm.2002.801465","title":"Analytical level crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Nakagami fading channels","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","topic":"Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fading; Nakagami distribution; Fade; Diversity combining; Maximal-ratio combining; Rayleigh fading; Channel (broadcasting); Statistics; Diversity gain; Diversity scheme; Fading distribution; Level crossing; Telecommunications; Envelope (radar); Channel state information; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Wireless; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002215667,0.001085062,0.0006420051,0.001690093,0.0004590667,0.001411378,0.0008325049,0.0007568255,0.002831266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127679,0.0004623545,0.0008220299,0.001636441,0.001040676,0.001584444,0.0006569261,0.001152421,0.0009831256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001478039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001014385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001328783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001252058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992195,0.0002326893,0.00005010604,0.00008782176,0.0002998949,0.0001098385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953608,0.003102303,0.0006801082,0.0002824976,0.0005115872,0.00006265484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842489,0.00002972769,0.0007249814,0.0002266546,0.0000315492,0.0002180949,0.0003073587,0.8495262,0.005859606,0.1160256,0.0009977624,0.02600412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000578207,0.00004293808,0.0004039948,0.00005809122,0.00002763411,0.0002558809,0.00005568738,0.9724519,0.002300816,0.02278255,0.001586896,0.00002780493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0255957,0.002925493,0.9637074,0.0001400521,0.00005243544,0.00004857827,0.00009990473,0.0002716479,0.007158588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8034031,0.009948515,0.1783695,0.000177863,0.0001840064,0.0002197933,0.0002541592,0.0002513604,0.007191754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002831266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01171774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08259165893051813,"score_gpt":0.2958363710545022,"score_spread":0.2132447121239841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}