{"id":"W1969326715","doi":"10.1177/002071520204300104","title":"The Globalization of Environmental Protection: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Globalization; Argument (complex analysis); Environmental degradation; International community; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental hazard; Environmental law; Political science; Environmental politics; Politics; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Economics; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008368819,0.0002994299,0.0004728062,0.001896111,0.006441595,0.006236047,0.0007288127,0.002988383,0.00476284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01712969,0.0002719222,0.0004828624,0.003109929,0.01567093,0.007730445,0.007825379,0.003881636,0.0002751382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004051443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002308502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006434876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00595292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908807,0.007211546,0.000160418,0.0003776476,0.0006080267,0.0007617234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824316,0.01217274,0.002056437,0.001407975,0.0008166782,0.00111465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000389885,0.00008875293,0.01427981,0.0001148277,0.00002212628,0.003575103,0.07179835,0.001524915,0.00032977,0.8773534,0.004360483,0.02651336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003862649,0.00009540248,0.05353614,0.0007032664,0.00005878669,0.002998527,0.122041,0.004660413,0.0009340283,0.4620942,0.3527482,0.00009144107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4513243,0.005630211,0.01552848,0.05520074,0.0003231563,0.00008520789,0.00007185865,0.00003654443,0.4717994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918265,0.001677272,0.001566925,0.001209205,0.0001544638,0.00003693489,0.0000148313,0.00002088583,0.003493064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04425907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03134670647504798,"score_gpt":0.35550491139381,"score_spread":0.324158204918762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}