{"id":"W1969334396","doi":"10.1016/j.compmedimag.2012.02.001","title":"A comparison of a Monte Carlo-based detection probability matrix with analytical probability matrix for small animal PET scanners","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Nuclear Physics; Université Hassan II de Casablanca; Université Paris Diderot; Université de Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Photon; Matrix (chemical analysis); Probability distribution; Contrast (vision); Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Positron emission tomography; Statistical physics; Measure (data warehouse); Noise (video); Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Physics; Computational physics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Optics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Nuclear medicine; Image (mathematics); Materials science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001255645,0.0002589304,0.0007365936,0.0001602401,0.0001380539,0.00002893288,0.0001653199,0.0001213446,0.00001143146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004906263,0.0001978114,0.000185213,0.0004309595,0.001014419,0.00007515254,0.00008302353,0.0005042596,4.143961e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005365756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002278642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000800379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009233718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977353,0.0001045721,0.0006480164,0.0004599231,0.0005527509,0.0004994232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978658,0.0003631467,0.0001966072,0.0004411476,0.0003136262,0.0008196835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005762415,0.008306338,0.8913324,0.00844823,0.0004781166,0.00004806132,0.0007759067,0.00004245927,0.008446799,0.01369653,0.003030014,0.05963275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003880314,0.0007134142,0.02214793,0.0005635525,0.0004687634,0.0002130952,0.0000588495,0.9668111,0.001351455,0.0009174664,0.002549325,0.0003246937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6760045,0.000231959,0.3170108,0.005353483,0.00005787341,0.001102263,0.00001595737,0.0002067493,0.00001641488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590737,0.00001352812,0.1402213,0.0003290048,0.0001385937,0.000168686,0.00002443668,0.00002452466,0.000006212963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8066513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04132836798912786,"score_gpt":0.362091235357459,"score_spread":0.3207628673683311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}