{"id":"W1969423728","doi":"10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.085","title":"Flux decline during cross flow membrane filtration of electrolytic solution in presence of charged nano-colloids: A simple electrokinetic model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colloid and Interface Science","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Water Research Institute; Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Electrokinetic phenomena; Electrolyte; Concentration polarization; Colloid; Membrane; Chemistry; Filtration (mathematics); Dimensionless quantity; Polarization (electrochemistry); Nano-; Electrophoresis; Chemical engineering; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemical physics; Chromatography; Thermodynamics; Materials science; Electrode; Composite material; Physical chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307682,0.0001243952,0.0002801406,0.0002543692,0.0001094557,0.00004583506,0.0006018412,0.00007914475,0.0001427384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007618322,0.0001058458,0.00004930393,0.0007745735,0.000859327,0.0009978196,0.0001656319,0.000310433,0.000002835312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001003091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003960712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002198386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980712,0.00002939626,0.000701243,0.0002302537,0.0006408104,0.000327115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989817,0.00006010665,0.0005509772,0.0002100343,0.0001168344,0.00008036097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348264,0.0000659313,0.002097816,0.00002152268,0.000002607554,2.4522e-7,0.0002637884,0.04484617,0.9522485,0.00005948727,0.00001738723,0.0002417857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004772998,0.0002838696,0.008279443,0.00002645718,0.000004833965,0.00003223868,0.00003791944,0.2239373,0.7663816,0.0004549781,0.000009387775,0.00007466938],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966188,0.00005484127,0.002466966,0.0001578463,0.00008711845,0.0001964629,0.000002935747,0.000009517164,0.0004055035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966918,0.00006779857,0.003012145,0.00001087943,0.00001080264,0.000003728067,2.652112e-7,0.000005658537,0.0001968904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4316266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007206017341105399,"score_gpt":0.264615244876193,"score_spread":0.2574092275350876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}