{"id":"W1969432826","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.17.1.1","title":"CHALLENGING CANADA'S NUCLEAR COMMITMENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF DEFENCE DISCOURSE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Politics; Underpinning; White (mutation); White paper; Nuclear weapon; Nuclear power; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Nuclear energy policy; Political economy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005826179,0.000840086,0.0007649733,0.008530088,0.0591482,0.02844751,0.00409343,0.006566156,0.00642105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133831,0.0005260492,0.000640076,0.02138499,0.03501223,0.006333635,0.007672803,0.006776256,0.0004792317],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3446449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2400264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890086,0.002190735,0.00018341,0.0006681957,0.004712595,0.003236448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905476,0.00475548,0.0005351462,0.000237436,0.002794444,0.001129859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000314356,0.00001993372,0.002457669,0.0001629963,0.00001728252,0.000612271,0.4199204,0.000519246,0.0002771196,0.542106,0.02367613,0.01019952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616526,0.00001174209,0.009735051,0.0005951722,0.00003026784,0.0001525461,0.5039138,0.0009214572,0.0003064784,0.02617716,0.4580297,0.0001103352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2535381,0.01831415,0.003039388,0.08882262,0.000528552,0.0001594228,0.001136362,0.00008074292,0.6343808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616253,0.004593552,0.001203071,0.004866248,0.0001140152,0.0001045685,0.0003843501,0.00009080447,0.02701792],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6553551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.760119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0321225210080143,"score_gpt":0.3113891153856742,"score_spread":0.2792665943776599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}