{"id":"W1969444050","doi":"10.5558/tfc85571-4","title":"Benefits of using genetically improved white spruce in Quebec: The forest landowner’s viewpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Reforestation; Genetic gain; Silviculture; Agroforestry; Forest management; Productivity; Wood production; Sowing; Sustainability; Agricultural science; Environmental science; Forestry; Business; Geography; Biology; Agronomy; Ecology; Economics; Genetic variation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000308395,0.0001414464,0.0001401117,0.00002373371,0.000110907,0.00003484643,0.0005707672,0.00005034147,0.0005532847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002058237,0.00007886273,0.0000694488,0.0002957264,0.0002544084,0.0001386042,0.0002101372,0.000147493,0.0001337147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001346106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000246271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01352227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03440163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989066,0.00005196766,0.0002675455,0.0001867215,0.000206292,0.0003808683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993182,0.00003573643,0.0001017694,0.0004921869,0.000005116285,0.00004703508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002244435,0.0003541063,0.3020851,0.00004564279,0.00003661308,0.000006926804,0.002584817,0.5972753,0.007312817,0.0215441,0.006995323,0.06153478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006934402,0.0001215101,0.9258371,0.00003308071,0.00002471538,0.000004982222,0.00003297598,0.06651113,0.0005196738,0.002791498,0.003260436,0.0001694668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897,0.0002310787,0.00004280921,0.002921243,0.00004365177,0.0003667932,0.000003440557,0.0000175808,0.006673471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974899,0.00004003609,0.0002120958,0.0006725632,0.0000804236,0.000007085638,0.000002556208,0.00001093209,0.001484436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6237519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0133628686246963,"score_gpt":0.2374070394729429,"score_spread":0.2240441708482467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}