{"id":"W1969444050","doi":"10.5558/tfc85571-4","title":"Benefits of using genetically improved white spruce in Quebec: The forest landowner’s viewpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Reforestation; Genetic gain; Silviculture; Agroforestry; Forest management; Productivity; Wood production; Sowing; Sustainability; Agricultural science; Environmental science; Forestry; Business; Geography; Biology; Agronomy; Ecology; Economics; Genetic variation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006095137,0.0001894965,0.0001689882,0.0005421677,0.0009476755,0.001146205,0.0005227595,0.0003175061,0.004082547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001438679,0.00005223384,0.0001797911,0.000734709,0.0004993884,0.0004887016,0.0002383564,0.0003440496,0.000180268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01344869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007311522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996676,0.00007672205,0.00001039563,0.00004722369,0.0001109617,0.00008704665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987646,0.0002174956,0.0001455019,0.00003819609,0.0006254378,0.0002087412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006662018,0.000232812,0.8488993,0.0001871382,0.0001516435,0.001120288,0.0009486185,0.005678693,0.01232763,0.003160425,0.005990436,0.1206369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002005728,0.0002129621,0.9793956,0.00009433136,0.0000852904,0.0001793201,0.002988797,0.004254774,0.001283298,0.0003271539,0.01112105,0.00003739995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720649,0.00174033,0.0006179583,0.003046284,0.00002623698,0.00003587298,0.0009581069,0.00002545586,0.02148492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936135,0.0006178662,0.0006146737,0.0003102894,0.000008651003,0.000006337363,0.0002142869,0.000005279147,0.004609071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02938265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09757751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0133628686246963,"score_gpt":0.2374070394729429,"score_spread":0.2240441708482467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}