{"id":"W1969445060","doi":"10.2136/sssaj2000.6462080x","title":"Tillage Effects on Carbon Fluxes in Continuous Wheat and Fallow–Wheat Rotations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tillage; Loam; Agronomy; Crop residue; Environmental science; Summer fallow; Conventional tillage; Cropping system; Plough; Crop rotation; Soil carbon; Residue (chemistry); Soil water; Crop; Soil science; Cropping; Chemistry; Biology; Agriculture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003722244,0.000408862,0.0002851618,0.0003128087,0.0002419118,0.0004613239,0.0002089951,0.0002605807,0.0006434044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005176974,0.000212353,0.0002305874,0.0002775349,0.0004043113,0.0002778325,0.0002515077,0.0002311772,0.00008831008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001423364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003631273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02137762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04485336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998251,0.00003438308,0.0000145636,0.00005346851,0.00001792074,0.0000547347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993113,0.0002181743,0.0001925457,0.00004613377,0.00004788213,0.0001839517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008274476,0.0005537351,0.178641,0.00009055784,0.0001758353,0.0002461805,0.000311574,0.001466282,0.8040959,0.00009146955,0.00009440056,0.00595852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007089067,0.0009440698,0.9780163,0.000003209067,0.0000476606,0.00004596744,0.0001018725,0.001421314,0.01909455,0.00004214406,0.0001999538,0.00001202057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998446,0.00002506904,0.00001927167,0.000001578513,7.795064e-7,0.000002089291,0.00004995611,0.000001636586,0.00005497788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999234,0.00004511311,0.0001363339,0.00001389289,0.000001691692,0.00001126383,0.0003032509,0.000003720589,0.000250876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02137762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0425064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006119282190766028,"score_gpt":0.2152472468567881,"score_spread":0.209127964666022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}