{"id":"W1969530778","doi":"10.4236/jsea.2014.73018","title":"A Quality Assurance Model for Airborne Safety-Critical Software","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Software Engineering and Applications","topic":"Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Avionics software; Software quality analyst; Software quality assurance; Software quality; Life-critical system; Verification and validation; Software quality control; Reliability engineering; Software development; Certification; Engineering; Software; Software construction; Avionics; Computer science; Systems engineering; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002579622,0.0007154564,0.0003895745,0.001368779,0.0006010804,0.002285296,0.001663298,0.001718674,0.002344582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006594631,0.0004377955,0.001119605,0.0008385578,0.001544475,0.002764071,0.001234384,0.001727979,0.0006134021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001837231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002204568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008222912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003799849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976356,0.0005378271,0.0002007269,0.0003319285,0.001049232,0.0002446757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944174,0.002359015,0.0009082547,0.0005739777,0.001519303,0.000222022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001468463,0.000256172,0.004237338,0.0002143968,0.00006115343,0.0007240638,0.001364538,0.3806637,0.01144245,0.5498062,0.002054231,0.04902888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005938857,0.0001791884,0.0007603067,0.00005708937,0.0000364907,0.0001932475,0.00009393067,0.8904958,0.001603193,0.09809873,0.008395532,0.00002699847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04149053,0.0002496996,0.9458713,0.0009128242,0.0000318754,0.0001613477,0.0001754388,0.0005847816,0.01052224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7766618,0.0004059133,0.2142498,0.0001578956,0.00005500384,0.000498838,0.0003989468,0.0001301269,0.007441612],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008222912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01635009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01150471182381399,"score_gpt":0.2479118920808337,"score_spread":0.2364071802570197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}